This research employs a survey experiment to evaluate a theory about source credibility, discovering that Republicans who contradict their partisan beliefs by correcting misinformation are the most convincing in convincing respondents to accept the scientific consensus on climate change. The study delves into how misconceptions about the scientific consensus on climate change are shaped by ideological divisions and deceptive statements from politicians. The effectiveness of these corrections depends on the recipient’s political affiliation, indicating that highlighting the perspectives of prominent Republicans who endorse the scientific consensus could facilitate unity across party lines on climate change.