This paper examines the continued-influence effect of misinformation, where people rely on false information even after it has been retracted. It examines whether retractions that repeat misinformation are more or less effective than those that avoid repetition, finding that retractions that explicitly repeat the misinformation are more successful in reducing its influence. The results suggest that myth debunking strategies may benefit from including reminders of misinformation to enhance the correction’s impact.
Title
Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction?
Summary
َAuthor
Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S.
Year
2017
َThematic Area
Communication Studies
Topic
Misinformation, disinformation, and malinformation
Country
Global
Region
Global
Misinformation Combatting
Misinformation Impact
Place Published
Publisher
Journal
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
URL
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014
APA 7th End Text Citation
Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.01.014